Skip to main
University-wide Navigation

Listen to a short summary of this research brief (1:19)

Trauma Informed Parenting Skills for Resource Parents

The following summary synthesizes findings from two studies evaluating Trauma-Informed Parenting Skills for Resource Parents (TIPS 4 RP), a 10-session therapeutic intervention developed by the UK Center on Trauma and Children to support foster, adoptive, and relative caregivers of children impacted by trauma.

Sprang, G., Gusler, S., Eslinger, J., & Whitt, A. (2026). Trauma-Informed Parenting Skills for Resource Parents: A Pilot Study of Acceptability, Feasibility, and Effectiveness. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma19(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-026-00824-3

Whitt, A., Sprang, G., & Gusler, S. (2026). Qualitative Analysis of Caregiver Experiences with a Child-Focused Intervention: Trauma-Informed Parenting Skills for Resource Parents (TIPS 4 RP). Journal of Child and Family Studies35(1), 170-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-025-03240-7

The Intervention

Children entering foster and relative care often have significant histories of trauma that can manifest as intense emotional dysregulation and destabilizing behaviors that can leave resource parents feeling overwhelmed and unprepared. While didactic training exists, there is a critical shortage of evidence-based interventions for families requiring more intensive support. TIPS 4 RP addresses this gap by focusing on four key needs: trauma awareness, the caregiver-child relationship as a healing context, adaptive coping strategies, and the creation of physical and psychological safety. TIPS 4 RP is built upon trauma-informed care principles and relies on a measurement-based care approach to successfully individualize treatment. 

Quantitative Outcomes and Efficacy

The quantitative pilot study involving 34 resource parents demonstrated significant improvements in:

  • Disruption Worry: Caregivers reported a decrease in anxiety regarding potential placement failures, a sentiment sustained through follow-up.
  • Knowledge and Skills: Participants showed increased trauma-informed competency.
  • Empathy: Improvements in empathy were noted, though these varied based on the sex of the child.

Additionally, high feasibility and acceptability ratings were noted:Session rating scores indicated intervention acceptability, and measures of feasibility identified the intervention as user-friendly. Significant challenges related to completion of study measures, even in those who completed the intervention were identified. The mode of delivery (in-person vs. telehealth) did not differentially impact outcomes.

Qualitative Insights and Caregiver Perspectives

Utilizing framework analysis on responses from 24 caregivers, the qualitative study designed to confirm and deepen understandings of preliminary indicators of effectiveness found: 

  • Perspective-Shifting: Specific therapeutic exercises were highlighted as transformative tools for perspective-shifting that helped caregivers better understand the impact of trauma on their child. This reframe from perceptions of intentional misbehavior to natural responses to perceived threat were described as reducing conflict and promoting trauma recovery in the context of the relationship.  
  • Placement Stability: Many caregivers reported that the intervention "kept them from giving up" by deepening their understanding and providing new trauma-informed parenting skills, and the intervention was described as benefitting the entire family unit.
  • Therapeutic alliance: Having a strong therapeutic alliance was described as being critical to being able to explore sensitive parenting challenges and benefit from the intervention.  

Implementation Issues

Despite high satisfaction and effectiveness, both studies identified some challenges:

  • Data Collection: Incomplete responses to data collection protocols were evident, even among those who finished the therapy.
  • Timing of Referrals: Non-completers often experienced placement disruptions very early in the process, suggesting that families may have been referred to the program only after a crisis had reached a breaking point.
  • Logistics: Caregivers expressed support for flexible scheduling and shorter, more frequent sessions to accommodate their high-stress lifestyles.

Ultimately, TIPS 4 RP appears to be a promising model for stabilizing placements by empowering caregivers as key "agents of change" through a strong therapeutic alliance.

two foster dads with a foster child

Translational Tips:

  • For resource parents who face significant parenting challenges, becoming a trauma-informed parent may provide them with a sense of self-efficacy, enhanced understanding, empathy, and the skills necessary to stabilize placements in danger of disruption. 
  • Early intervention is key. Referrals to Trauma-Informed Parenting for Resource Parents (TIPS 4 RP) should occur early in the placement; resource parents are unlikely to invest in treatment once they have made the decision to terminate the placement.
  • Trauma-Informed Parenting for Resource Parents can be delivered effectively via telehealth, increasing access for caregivers in rural areas.
  • Online formats for measures and spreading questions throughout the intervention can facilitate measurement-based care approaches, like the one used in TIPS 4 RP. 
  • Proactively schedule booster sessions or provide online refreshers to prevent the fading of learned skills over time and support placement stability could be useful. 

Subscribe to the Evidence in Action Research Brief

Sign up here if you want to receive Evidence in Action in your inbox!

Subscribe